I exposed a 120 roll of the new Portra in December and January. The usual test target this time of year- Orion. Three exposures using the Pentax 67 and the 165mm f/2.8 lens riding piggyback. SQM reading for the night of this test were 21.41 mags/sq-arc-sec. The air temperature was 20 degrees F. An average night for my location. The film was processed by Color Services in February. Negatives were scanned by myself on an Epson V600 scanner.
15 minutes f/2.8 30 minutes f/4 15 minutes f/4 |
Orion - Pentax 67 165mm 30 minutes f/4 Note the Witch Head nebula right of Rigel. Not bad for 30 minutes at f/4 |
Cropped section showing detail at 1200 PPI scan. Click for 100% view. The blown highlights are not on the original negative. It is an artifact of my processing. |
While the film recorded many faint features in the area, such as the Witch Head nebula near Rigel, colors were rather muted compared to a really great negative film, Superia 100. Perhaps a few tricks in post processing could bring out better detail and colors. This is a preliminary test and I suspect better results could be obtained with longer exposures. Granted, the objects in this field, with the exception of the Orion Nebula are pretty faint. Perhaps a brighter target may make this film shine. Indeed I get the feeling that this film would do well on the brighter Summer Milky Way.
Another exciting possibility for this film is the avaialbility of large format sizes. Portra 400 is available in 4x5 and 8x10! Someone ought to try it. Large format camera lenses have slower f-ratios and need fast film if used for astrophotography.
Under the Light of the Moon
Pentax 67 45mm f/4 @ f/8 10 minutes exposure under the Gibbous Moon |
Other photographers using this film have reported amazing ISO range. Yes ISO range. You can expose this film from ISO 100 to 1600 with very good results without pushing. Only time will tell how good the new Porta 400 will work in a variety of settings, but I am very impressed with it. Grain was the best I have seen in a 400 speed film, colors were neither saturated or muted when exposed properly. It is perhaps not the best film for astrophotography, but it is perhaps one of the best all-purpose films around. I'll be shooting more Portra and I will come back and review it again once I can expose this film under the light of Sagittarius and other summertime goodies.
I hope to try it with LF format - and maybe soon. Got any hypering equipment?
ReplyDeleteI don't use hypered film myself. Perhaps one day. I will be shooting more Portra 400 if this weather ever clears here in New England.
ReplyDeleteI would be interested in seeing your LF results!
I am going to be down in Nevada for the 2012 annular eclipse, Im going to try some LF wide field photography with this film! I'm curious how this will fare at around... 1hr@f5.6 and 2hr@f8 Im gonna be doing some milky way shots, Could be cool to see how it goes.
ReplyDeleteI used this film in the summer and did not have as good of a response to what is the brightest portion of the Milky Way. A strong cyan cast becomes prevelent. For 35mm I would recommend cheap Fujicolor 100 (CN), not to be confused with Reala 100 (CS). Reala is junk for this type of work. Good luck.
ReplyDelete